SIGEEI
← Todas as avaliações

Ficha de avaliação EICAT

Pinus elliottii

Engelm.

MR · Alto

Avaliação histórica recuperada de registros do SIGEEI. A estrutura e os campos foram preservados; a confirmação permanece pendente.

Identificação e síntese

Nomes comunspinus, pinheiro-americano, pinheiro-amarelo, pinheiro
Síntese dos impactossupressão de vegetação nativa pelo acúmulo de acículas no chão, sombreamento.

Taxonomia registrada

Classificação canônica recuperada da integração com o GBIF. O sistema explicita os níveis que a própria resposta do GBIF não informa.

ReinoPlantae
FiloTracheophyta
ClassePinopsida
OrdemPinales
FamíliaPinaceae
GêneroPinus
Bases de dados consultadasGRIIS,Base de dados Nacional (Instituto Hórus)

Avaliação de impactos

Há evidência de impacto ambiental?Sim

1. Redução no desempenho de indivíduos da biota nativa

Resposta: Sim

Mecanismos selecionados: (1) Competição,(10) Impacto físico no ecossistema

Evidências por mecanismo

Competição

1. Plots with Pinus have lower forest tree density than plots lacking Pinus, and Pinus abundance decreased with increases in tree density. Forest tree density varied from 35 to 1,616 plants ha−1, and Pinus were found only in plots with tree densities below 805 plants ha−1. Plots with intermediate native tree densities were colonized only by P. elliottii and P. taeda, and plots with lower native tree densities and old fields were colonized by all three invasive species. Pinus elliottii was the species exhibiting the least invasive behavior in Rio Negro among the three invasives.

Impacto físico no ecossistema

2. Slash pine was correlated with lower non-graminoid species richness and plant density in both São Paulo and Mississippi; however, these apparent negative effects were 4.6 and 11 times stronger in the non-native range of Brazil (for richness and density, respectively). Native graminoids were not present in invaded cerrado. Overhead slash pine canopy cover, pine density, and needle depth were 5.2, 3.7, and at 14 times higher, respectively, in Brazil than in Mississippi savannas, for similarly-aged pine stands. One year after implementing needle litter treatments in Brazilian cerrado and restored Mississippi savanna, plant density and non-graminoid species richness were highly suppressed, but to similar degrees in both ranges. Our results suggest that higher rates of needle deposition, associated with higher tree densities, contribute to the stronger suppression of native species in Brazil than in Mississippi.

Referências: 1. Zenni, R.D., Simberloff, D. Number of source populations as a potential driver of pine invasions in Brazil. Biol Invasions 15, 1623–1639 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0397-4 2. Brewer, J.S., Souza, F.M., Callaway, R.M. et al. Impact of invasive slash pine (Pinus elliottii) on groundcover vegetation at home and abroad. Biol Invasions 20, 2807–2820 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1734-z

2. Declínio no tamanho populacional de espécie nativa

Resposta: Sim

Mecanismos selecionados: (10) Impacto físico no ecossistema

Evidências por mecanismo

Impacto físico no ecossistema

1. Slash pine was correlated with lower non-graminoid species richness and plant density in both São Paulo and Mississippi; however, these apparent negative effects were 4.6 and 11 times stronger in the non-native range of Brazil (for richness and density, respectively). Native graminoids were not present in invaded cerrado. Overhead slash pine canopy cover, pine density, and needle depth were 5.2, 3.7, and at 14 times higher, respectively, in Brazil than in Mississippi savannas, for similarly-aged pine stands. One year after implementing needle litter treatments in Brazilian cerrado and restored Mississippi savanna, plant density and non-graminoid species richness were highly suppressed, but to similar degrees in both ranges. Our results suggest that higher rates of needle deposition, associated with higher tree densities, contribute to the stronger suppression of native species in Brazil than in Mississippi.

Referências: 1. Brewer, J.S., Souza, F.M., Callaway, R.M. et al. Impact of invasive slash pine (Pinus elliottii) on groundcover vegetation at home and abroad. Biol Invasions 20, 2807–2820 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1734-z

3. Extinção local de população nativa

Resposta: Sim

Mecanismos selecionados: (11) Impacto estrutural no ecossistema

Evidências por mecanismo

Impacto estrutural no ecossistema

1. Twenty-two years after the arrival of the first invasive trees (founders), the grassland savannah has become a dense pine forest with 12,455 individuals ha−1, a basal area of 26.44 m2 ha−1, a sparse native woody understory comprised of 16 species (H' = 0.44), density of 1210 individuals ha−1 and the herbaceous layer totally absent. Invasion by Pinus elliottii has completely changed the structure of the grassland savannah and caused severe plant diversity losses. Native species surviving the invasion in the understory do not typically represent the previous composition and functional traits of the native vegetation.

Referências: 1. Rodolfo C.R. de Abreu & Giselda Durigan (2011) Changes in the plant community of a Brazilian grassland savannah after 22 years of invasion by Pinus elliottii Engelm, Plant Ecology & Diversity, 4:2-3, 269-278, DOI: 10.1080/17550874.2011.594101

4. Reversibilidade da extinção local após remoção do táxon

Resposta: Reversível

Mecanismos selecionados: (11) Impacto estrutural no ecossistema

Evidências por mecanismo

Impacto estrutural no ecossistema

Extinção local apenas nos pontos invadidos. Com a remoção da invasão é possível que as espécies nativas retornem ao local.

Regiões, confiança e referências

Países ou regiões com impactos mais severosAustrália; Brasil; SZ-alt-variant; Uruguai; África do Sul
Locais de maior impactoCerrado, Campo
Grau de confiançaAlta
Justificativa da confiançatodos os trabalhos realizados apontam para a mesma direção e intensidade de impacto. Há evidências para diferentes ecossistemas, tanto observacionais quanto experimentais.
Vias e vetores de introduçãoagricultura
Referências adicionaisnão

Proveniência e registro

Pessoa responsável pela análiseRafael Dudeque Zenni
VerificaçãoNão verificado
Data de publicação13/04/2021
Número da versão1
Editor da versão atualRafael
Origem da recuperaçãolegacy_yii_logs_and_public_pages